Claudia’s fraud in the 2024 Mexican presidential election is discovered
2,459 polling stations of the 5,561 of the Quick Count where there was fraud have been located. And the 73,919 polling stations of the District Count where they altered the vote in favor of Claudia. This is a world scandal.
Benford’s Law was applied, which is used to detect financial, fiscal or electoral fraud, and an irregular deviation was found in the polling stations that have between 200 and 299 votes, that is, those that begin with the digit “2”… that is, they put in extra votes or duplicated votes.
The electoral expert who calls himself “Fuerza Ciudadana” had already warned us about this and he continues to investigate with other traditional methods, but it was still necessary to prove it and now we know how and where they carried out the electoral fraud, polling station by polling station.
The percentage expected by Benford’s law for that range of polling stations would be 17.6% and Claudia receives votes there for a percentage of 43.51%, that is, a deviation of 25.91 percentage points!!! which denotes a mega-fraud that will surprise world experts in electoral, fiscal or financial fraud… The results of this election have already become a worldwide disgrace, they are totally indefensible, but by applying the algorithms of Benford’s Law they will go down in world history as a great scandal! The fraud has been exposed even if the Electoral Court has validated the election without having carried out any audit or investigation! After this is known, the results of the Mexican presidential election will be displayed worldwide as an example of what should not be done, an example of fraud that will be displayed in all the schools of the world.
It is a global scandal.
Xóchitl’s votes do follow the expected distribution of Benford’s Law.
There was also fraud in Alvarez Máynez’s votes, which were also inflated for legislative overrepresentation, as part of the soft Coup d’Etat that AMLO wants to carry out and that was already denounced by The Wall Street Journal, in which they want to take Mexico to a communist dictatorship, leaving the three powers in the hands of a single person (the executive with fraud, the legislative with overrepresentation and the judicial with judicial reform). See here 2/
And all this affected the total vote, which no longer complied with the expected distribution of Benford’s Law.
In principle, we only applied Benford’s Law to the 5,651 Quick Count polling stations, which is a significant sample of the election, according to the model used by the scientists to give the results on the same night of the election, Sunday, June 2. In other words, their same weapon of fraud was used to reveal the fraud… Ingenious, isn’t it!
The surprising thing is that when we applied Benford’s Law to the 170,486, what do you think? Bingo! It gave us the same fraudulent deviation, which shows two things:
1. that fraud was committed in the ENTIRE election
2. that the model used by the scientists was perfect, both to give the results of the election… but also to demonstrate the fraud! since they were indeed representative of the universe. And that is what we had said, that the president of the INE, Guadalupe Taddei, shocked Xóchitl and the entire country with those results on Sunday night to give a “psychological blow” as recommended by the Communist Forum of Sao Paolo and leave them in the first of the five steps of a duel, that is, in total stupefaction, in denial (like said Elizabeth Kübler Ross). But they had deceived Xóchitl who could not know that the INE had given garbage to the scientists, as La Carpeta Púrpura already proved in its other investigations that showed that the Quick Count has 76% of inconsistencies with respect to the District Count… But now we see that there were not only inconsistencies, but there was also fraud, as has just been demonstrated based on Benford’s Law, which was recommended to us by one of the greatest experts in statistics in Mexico, whose name we reserve. The results of this election are no longer credible once they failed the expected distribution of Benford’s Law.
Here you can find the 2,459 polling stations where fraud occurred, only those that appear in the Quick Count:
And here you can see the 73,919 polling stations whose first voting digit begins with two (mainly from 200 to 299) where fraud occurred, according to Benford’s Law.
In total, 73,919 polling stations were affected, with a total of 17,934,137 votes in the voting range of 200 to 299 votes per polling station and an as yet undetermined percentage of 65,038 polling stations were affected in the range of 100 to 199, which implies 10,244,438 votes for Claudia. If they are subtracted from the 35,924,519 assigned to her by the INE District Computation, then Claudia’s final vote is between 7.7 million and 17.9 million, so she would lose the election compared to the 16.4 million votes assigned to Xóchitl, since duplicate records and records signed with blank votes have also been detected, plus “shoe” polling stations that when subtracted would leave Claudia below 16 million votes. This would require a forensic audit of the ENTIRE election or, better yet, to VOID this election with countless frauds (multifactor frauds) and repeat it.
Instructions to be able to read the list of polling stations where the fraud was committed
The unique number that we constructed to be able to relate the three databases (Quick Count, PREP and District Count) because the INE did not provide the polling station code for the Quick Count, is the following:
state number-electoral section-polling station identification-polling station type and extraordinary or adjacent polling station.
Example: Section 424 of Aguascalientes, basic number one, not extraordinary or contiguous:
1-424-1-B-0
This is the algorithm:
ID_ESTADO & “-” & SECCION & “-” & ID_CASILLA & “-” & TIPO_CASILLA & “-” &EXT_CONTIGUA
For experts, Benford’s Law is a chi-square statistic that measures the difference between the observed distribution of the first digits and the expected distribution according to Benford’s law.
Here we publish the list of polling stations where the fraud was committed. If these ballot boxes are opened and the voter’s CURP is compared with the voter’s ID, it will appear that migrants were introduced or that voter IDs were cloned so that the “raccoons” of Morena could vote two or three or more times or they impersonated living citizens or even dead ones, which is why they inflated the electoral roll by 7 million people, as reported by experts in demography and population (El Universal, date) and verified with the projections of the population over 18 years of age for 2024 of the National Population Council (CONAPO) and with a projection of the National Population and Housing Census of INEGI for 2020 with an annual population growth rate of 1.2%.
In these polling stations, an algorithm was applied so that the vote in favor of Claudia was 64.2% and that of Xóchitl was 22.9%, to inflate Claudia’s vote and inhibit Xóchitl’s vote. There is also a deviation in the boxes where Claudia’s votes range from 100 to 199 votes, of almost 8% with respect to the expected distribution of Benford’s Law. But the deviation in the boxes from 200 to 299 is scandalous, of 25.91 percentage points, which denotes a gigantic fraud (Belford’s law would expect a percentage of 17.6% and instead Claudia’s vote in that range is 43.51%. That’s where the fraud was!!!). This election does not support an audit. The problem, as already said, is not in the votes that come out of the ballot boxes, but in how they entered the ballot boxes. The fraud has already been detected, located and it would only be necessary to open those packages and show it. The Electoral Tribunal did not want to do it, will the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation or the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) want to do it?
Our obligation was to investigate until we discovered the fraud, we already found it. There is a criminal complaint in progress. The crime is already known. Will there be political will to find the criminal and punish him?
This will go down in history. If this election is not ANNULLED, Claudia will forever bear the stain of having stolen the presidential election, of having committed fraud and therefore it will be illegal and illegitimate, that is to say “spurious”… And as the Constituents of 1917 warned “when the president is weakened, the nation is weakened”… Hopefully truth, reason and justice will prevail so that our democracy, our rule of law and our freedoms are saved and ALL Mexicans can be well, at peace and happy.
Notes
1/ Benford Law
2/
“Mexico Flirts with Dictatorship”: WSJ details possible risks of judicial reform and overrepresentation of Morena
