---

1.A magistrate explained the cases or situations in which a presidential election must be annulled.

2. The electoral judicial training center published the 7 principles that must be observed in every election so that it can be considered valid.
3. On July 8, Mr. Guillermo Hamdan filed a complaint with the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic FGR for constitutional violations and electoral fraud.
4. The Peace With Dialogue organization warns that the election cannot be validated or the president-elect confirmed because the upper chamber of the electoral court is not properly integrated.
5. The electoral court describes AMLO as an electoral criminal.
6. A public expert the 9 constitutional violations that were committed in the presidential election on August 10.
7. The Purple Folder published on August 8 an x-ray and chronology of the fraud in the presidential election where these constitutional violations are observed.
8. A magistrate warns that the court’s ruling “is far” from guaranteeing electoral integrity and the highest constitutional rigor, but they still voted unanimously to approve the inconsistencies on August 12.
9. If, despite the constitutional violations and the fact that the integrity of the electoral process was violated, the electoral court rules in favor of the approval of the election, that will mean that national instances will be exhausted because the court is the last instance and then it will be possible to go to international bodies such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
10. Judge Janine Otalora warns of the irregularities that put the election at risk.
11. In which cases a presidential election should be annulled for violation of constitutional principles.
    On 05/02/2019, Judge Felipe de la Mata Pizaña of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation wrote a thesis in which he maintains “the annulment of the election due to violation of constitutional principles.”
    https://www.te.gob.mx/blog/delamata/front/articles/article/134
12. The Electoral Judicial Training Center published the 7 principles that must be observed in every election so that it can be considered valid principles that must be observed in every election so that it can be considered valid:

. Certainty, legality, independence, impartiality and objectivity.

. Authentic and periodic free elections.

. Secret and direct free universal vote.
, professionalism.
. Equity.
. Control of the constitutionality and legality of electoral acts and resolutions.
. Definitiveness.

He explained that the “invalidity of the election due to violation of constitutional principles.”
“It derives from an interpretation of the upper chamber of the TEPJF “…an act cannot be understood as an election referred to in the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States when it does not conform to the elements provided for in it nor is it possible to recognize legal effects.” but on the contrary, it must be deprived of its effects, which can be identified as a cause of disability due to constitutional violations.

3. On July 8, criminal lawyer Guillermo Hamdan filed a complaint with the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic FGR for constitutional violations and electoral fraud.
   Mr. Hamdan presents that electoral fraud is part of a “state election” which in turn is part of a coup d’état that the president of the republic AMLO intends to carry out, consisting of:
4. Fraud in the presidential election.l
5. Legislative overrepresentation.
6. The pseudo judicial reform To put the 3 powers of the union in the hands of a single person. The demand can be consulted here:
   https://lacarpetapurpura.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=786&action=edit

Accuse-905×1024.png.webbp

4. The organization Paz con Diálogo warns that the election cannot be validated or the president-elect confirmed because it is not “properly integrated” in the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal.
   Peace with dialogue
   @peace with dialogue
   Extra Extra
   THE COUP D’ÉTAT that AMLO @López Obrador_ announced, but the GUILTY are He @Mexican Senate and @SCJN.

The certificate of President-elect cannot be extended to @Claudiashein because the Superior Chamber (@ TEPJF_ informa) is not properly integrated.
@xóchitl Gálvez

Warns that Sheinbaum CANNOT BE President-elect because article 99, third paragraph of the Constitution establishes that the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation must be made up of 7 Magistrates.
When 2 Magistrates were about to finish, the Supreme Court carried out its corresponding procedure and chose 2 shortlists for each of the Magistrates and sent an official letter to the Senate that was received on September 26, 2023.

The Senate, according to the organic law of the Judicial Branch of the Federation (article 179, subsection d), has 15 business days, that is, it had until October 17 to inform the Supreme Court of the result of the vote, because if the vote It was not approved, the Supreme Court would have to send another 2 shortlists again.

But it turns out that the Senate did not vote on the two shortlists, therefore it did not send the information to the Supreme Court. But the serious thing here is that the Supreme Court did not disagree with the Senate to rush them to be able to have the appointments before 11/01/2023, which was when the 2 Magistrates finished. Then on 11/01/2023, both the Senate and the Supreme Court violated the Constitution by leaving the upper court with only 5 Justices.

Mr. Hamdan says that if there are 7 because there are 6, “it is evident that there is irregular management there.”

We can add that the person responsible is President AMLO, who gave the order to the senators not to act without his consent and to do so without removing a comma from his initiatives of not appointing the 2 missing Judges, as they have done by not appointing the commissioners of the INAI and other officials in the regional courts, in order to hinder the functioning of the Republic and the Powers of the Union, which is why he must be accused of treason.

@ Peace With Dialogue

EXTRA EXTRA
THE COUP D’ÉTAT that AMLO @lópezobrador_ announced, but the culprits are the @senadomexicano and @ SCJN.
The certificate of president-elect cannot be extended to @Claudia Sheinbaum because the Superior Chamber (@TEPJF_ informs) is not PROPERLY INTEGRATED
@Xóchitl Gálvez
Sheinbaum CANNOT be Elected President

https://x.com/PazConDialogo/status/1822146830223786158?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1822146830223786158%7Ctwgr%5E3582c5c1212cbe3e399bbc00c 3d0cf528b393e31%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Flacarpetapurpura.com%2Fcalificacion-judicial- failed-of-the-presidential-election-of-mexico-2024-another-leg-of-the-coup-d-état%2F

5. The Electoral Court described President AMLO as practically an electoral criminal who violated the impartiality of the electoral process and ruled that President AMLO intervened in elections: improperly used public resources and social programs, coerced citizens’ votes, carried out personalized promotion and Spread government propaganda during a prohibited period.
   On July 11, the Specialized Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation (TEPJF) determined that President Andrés Manuel López Obrador coerced the vote of citizens and improperly used social programs within the framework of the electoral process.
   The Mexican president violated the principles of impartiality, neutrality and equity in the contest, improperly used public resources and social programs aimed at conditioning the validity or benefits of social programs to a certain political option obtaining a qualified majority in the Congress of the Union, he said. the room.

These demonstrations, the Plenary considered, had an electoral impact since they were calls to vote in favor of one political option and against another, with which they intended to influence the preferences of citizens.

Historic ruling

President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), sentenced as an electoral offender by the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Power of the Federation TEPJF
https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/politica/TEPJF-determino-que-AMLO-coacciono-el-voto-y-uso-programas-sociales-en-el-marco-del-process-electoral-20240711- 0110.html

6. An expert published the 9 Constitutional violations that were committed in the presidential election on August 10 and warned that “the law is not half violated. It is violated or it is not violated. (Therefore) a criterion of gradualness cannot be applied” and since there are these violations, the election must be annulled “in accordance with the Constitution!”
   JAVA2355
   @java235531553
   Reasons why an election is annulled in accordance with the Constitution!
   Gentlemen Judges of the TEPJF, the law is not half violated, it is violated or it is not violated, a criterion of gradualness cannot be applied!
   THE ELECTION MUST BE CANCELLED!
   @TEPJF_informa

TheElectionMustAnnul

7. The Purple Folder published the X-ray and Chronology of Fraud in the Presidential Election
   Radiography and Chronology of Fraud in the Presidential Election
   Any resolution of the INE may be reviewed by the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation (PJF). Anything now “is not final” says the lic. Hamdan.
   One issue is the electoral situation and another very different is the criminal situation for the commission of electoral crimes, which must be investigated even if they declare the election valid and declare “president-elect.”
8. A magistrate warns that the ruling of the Electoral Court is far from guaranteeing electoral integrity and the highest constitutional rigor… so why not annul it? sounds incongruous

Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón
@ReyesRdzM
During today’s session of the plenary session of the
@TEPJF_informa
, we unanimously declare the annulment trials related to the presidential election unfounded. Although I agreed with this decision and, therefore, with the validity of the presidential election, I did not share the analysis or the legal methodology of the sentence, which is why I presented a concurring vote.

9. If, despite the Constitutional violations and the fact that the integrity of the electoral process was violated, the Electoral Court rules in favor of the approval of the election, that will mean that national remedies have been exhausted, because the Court is the last resort, and then you can go to international bodies, such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
   Mr. Hamdan points out that it would be a shame to have to go to international bodies because that would mean that Mexicans are incapable of resolving our differences by ourselves. However, since the Electoral Tribunal has been damaged or incomplete, and one of its six members was appointed in an irregular and deceitful manner to favor the Morena party, its presidential candidate and/or be under presidential orders, which affects its impartiality and good judgment, that means that the Court became complicit in the electoral fraud, the State election and the Coup d’état, which justifies going to international bodies because there were serious violations of the General Constitution of the United Mexican States and a crime was committed. electoral fraud as part of a “state election” which in turn is a coup d’état that puts at risk the democracy of Mexico, the rule of law and the civic liberties of Mexicans, so the human rights of Mexicans have been violated.
10. Judge Janine Otalora warns of the irregularities that put the election at risk
    – Judge Janine Otalora herself lists four issues that were ignored and that put the election of June 2 at risk… We ask again: if the integrity of the presidential election was not guaranteed, then why can it be validated? Again it sounds incongruous. Here Laura Brugés summarizes the judge’s intervention:
    See new posts
    Conversation
    Laura Bruges
    @LauraBruges
    Que barbara
    @JanineOtalora
    In his speech, he summarized the issues that were ignored and that put the June 2 election at risk:
    1- There were advanced processes
    2- Interference of the President in the election through his morning calls
    3-Incomplete magistrates
    4- Intervention of the CO in the election
    “Is organized crime an autonomous perpetrator or an assistant?” said the judge.
    And despite everything, in the end he recognizes Sheinbaum’s triumph, without wasting this intervention
    Sources:
    Share this:

• Twitter
• Facebook
  •
  I like this:
  August 13, 2024
  SEPPI group
  Information & Analysis

---

The Purple Folder

—

See the cited documents here:

Ver los documentos citados aquí:

https://lacarpetapurpura.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=834&action=edit